Meeting postponed/campaign spending controversy

Hi all,

First, apologies – I need to cancel the discussion of Europe on Sunday: I hope to return to the issue at a later date.

Various constituents have asked about the Daily Mirror story alleging possible illegal spending by the Conservatives to win support in the General Election – for those who missed the story, it’s here.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/tory-mps-broke-election-laws-7467576

It’s not in dispute that the Conservatives made up for the shortage of local campaigners by bussing in a large team to a candidate should be counted as local spending or national spending. If the former, then the series of marginal seats. The question is whether the payment of hotel expenses for people on a national bus who say they’re campaigning for a local spending limit has potentially been breached in a number of constituencies. If the latter, then the law needs to be looked at again, since it would be an obvious gap.

The reason this matters is that the spending limits are the only that we are able to avoid the US situation developing, in which only the very rich or people with very rich friends can normally compete. The Conservative Party has a very substantial advantage in financial resources, which they are currently reinforcing by changing the law to reduce Labour’s income from trade unions, as well as reducing the money paid to all Opposition parties for policy research..

Personally, I’d like to see much lower spending limits at a national level, balanced by an opportunity for each party to present its programme on TV in some detail. That’s how they do it in Denmark – each party gets half an hour to put its ideas forward, followed by 45 minutes of searching questions on the details by a panel of independent experts. The larger parties don’t get more time (though their broadcasts are closer to election day): it’s their responsibility to see that their ideas stand up to scrutiny without getting special treatment. In these days of Euro-debate, it’s worth noting that other countries sometimes do things better!

Best wishes

 

Nick

 

Posted in Broxtowe | Leave a comment

Europe, politics and everything – special eat’n’debate next Sunday

Hi all,
It’s nearly a year since the election, and I thought it might be interesting to catch up! So I’d like to invite you to a one-off “eat’n’debate” next Sunday March 13 at 1pm the Sheng Hua Chinese restaurant, 136A High Road, Beeston NG9 2LN with two main themes:

  • The European referendum: what should be the key issues as we decide?
  • The political outlook: with the Government and Opposition both soul-searching, what’s the way forward?

The arrangement will be the same as when I used to do this regularly – participation is £20, for which you get a good buffet meal and up to two hours of stimulating, friendly discussion. (Drinks are I think extra.) £10 goes to the restaurant, and £10 to Broxtowe Labour Party to help in the work to present a constructive alternative to Government, MP and Council! You don’t need to agree with me on anything – come and debate freely. My only request is that you debate politely and respect the others’ right to have their own views – it’s what makes these events interesting.

PLEASE CONFIRM if you’d like to come, so we can prepare the right number of places. No need to pay in advance.
Best wishes

Nick

Posted in Broxtowe | Leave a comment

Head vs heart – the animal experiments debate

Hi all,

As many of you know, I’ve been working as Director of Policy for Cruelty Free International since I lost the seat in 2010. My recent blog on the issue of animal testing has attracted a lot of attention, so I thought some of you might be interested too.

https://www.crueltyfreeinternational.org/blog/are-animal-experiments-head-vs-heart-choice

This isn’t a party matter, and I regularly talk to people across parties about it – I arranged a meeting in the Commons last week with prominent Conservatives, Labour and SNP participants. It’s an interesting job, which has taken me to 25 countries over the last few years as we work to change the laws around the world to reduce animal suffering. We’re making steady progress!

Best regards

Nick

Posted in Broxtowe | Leave a comment

Europe: decision day coming

Hi all,

I’ve not posted for a while, and I’m afraid it’s just that I’ve been taking a break from politics – travelling for pleasure, going out to the theatre and movies, sorting out some family issues, winning some poker tournaments. I’m sorry not to have won last May, but freedom has its charms too!

However, with the referendum apparently just months away, I thought it might be helpful to post some comments on that. It’s a pity, in my view, that the debate is focused so much on whether Mr Cameron’s frankly modest renegotiation package is successful or not. It’s always been obvious to anyone in politics that Mr Cameron had a 3-point plan:

  1. Offer the referendum as a way to bring UKIP leaners back and win the election
  2. Get some sort of token package of reform
  3. Declare victory and win the referendum

Older people remember all this – it’s exactly what Harold Wilson did in the 60s. You may think it’s cynical, though stage 1 certainly worked – if the Conservatives hadn’t offered the referendum, they’d have leaked a few percentage points to UKIP and we’d now have a different government. A good thing or a bad thing, it’s all history.

But quite soon, Mr Cameron will also be history – he’s retiring whether he wins or not. I wish him many happy years, but it would be ridiculous to decide the future of Britain on the basis of whether we approve of a retiring politician and his manoeuvres.

The fundamental issue is this – and it’s something which has struck me with increasing force in my present (animal welfare) job, which has taken me to 25 countries in the last few years. The world is increasingly divided into regional power blocs. Nearly every continent has one now, in different stages of development, each with preferential trade internally and an attempt to form a common front to defend their interests globally.

We do not have a choice of blocs – we can’t sensibly join NAFTA in North America or ASEAN in South East Asia or the African Union. We can be in the EU, or we can be on our own. And to be on our own in today’s world is a risky and frankly unusual decision. If we think we can win global arguments on our own, we are deluded; what will usually happen is that we will bob along in the slipstream of decisions made by others.

This is not to argue that the EU is a terrific example of good governance. It creaks. It’s not very transparent. It’s slow. It’s dominated by big business. But for this continent, it’s actually the only game in town.

That’s illustrated by the difficulty that the Leave campaign is having in identifying the alternative. Broadly speaking, there are two variants. We can join EFTA, like Norway, or we can refuse to join anything. If we join EFTA, we will have almost exactly the same rules as now – for instance, we will still have free movement of labour from throughout the EU. In EFTA, I don’t think we’d see a big exodus of business. The difference is merely that we will have less influence in deciding what those rules are, and certainly no veto. Or we can be entirely separate. But that means being outside the EU free trade area, subject to tariffs. In that case, we really would see the big companies moving out with a big loss of jobs. Their European offices are going to be more important than the British market if we force them to choose.

I’ve heard the comparison that the EU is like an awkward marriage – there comes a point where you feel that the marriage is just too much hassle, and you’d be happier with someone else. But we need to be clear that there isn’t anyone else: the alternative is splendid isolation. To pursue the analogy, we would be choosing to be lone bachelors in a world increasingly dominated by families.

I don’t think it’s a good idea. I think we realistically belong in the European area, and we should work to make the best of it instead of grumbling from the sidelines. But I’m not saying that because I’m interested in Mr Cameron’s package, or any other politician’s stance.

It simply seems to me that we are best off staying in partnership with our neighbours, whether it’s difficult or not. In the end, Europe is going to sink or swim together, and we cannot opt out of that reality – only from being part of the decisions that will decide whether it succeeds or not. Don’t vote for tactical reasons, to annoy Cameron or reward anyone else. Instead, vote for a coherent long-term future for Britain as part of the continent where we live.

Best regards

Nick

Posted in Broxtowe | Leave a comment

Happy Christmas!

…and a merry New Year (I think that’s the right way round, don’t you?). Be safe, be happy, and enjoy what 2016 brings…

Nick

Posted in Broxtowe | Leave a comment